Sunday, November 22, 2009

CRU data was always crap

10 measly trees in Yamal? No scientist could possibly accept 10 trees as a representative temperature proxy.

"A dog ate the world's most important scientific measurement." No it didn't. They deleted it just like they said they would (see hacked CRU emails).

Using data from other researchers literally upside down passed peer review and was published.

No comments: